www.dehdan.org

The Emotional and Ethical Dimensions of Multiple Kidney Transplants: A Case Study

1. Introduction

   In February 2025, Devendra Barlewar, a 47-year-old scientist working with the Defence Research and Development Organisation (DRDO), underwent his third kidney transplant at Amrita Hospital in Faridabad. This rare procedure led to Barlewar living with five kidneys, two of his own and three transplanted, with only one functioning. His case brings attention not just to the medical intricacies of repeated organ transplants but also the emotional and ethical complexities that such cases raise.

2. The Medical Challenges of Multiple Kidney Transplants

   Kidney transplants are life-saving treatments for people suffering from end-stage renal disease, and the success of a transplant can drastically improve a person's quality of life. However, the complexity of undergoing multiple kidney transplants is significant:

   • Finding Compatible Donors: Each transplant requires a donor with a suitable match in terms of blood type, tissue compatibility, and other factors. Finding a matching donor repeatedly, especially for multiple transplants, is rare, as the chances of compatibility grow smaller with each procedure.
   • Surgical Complexity: Each additional transplant involves not only the careful removal of the old kidney but also the challenging process of fitting a new one into an already complicated bodily system. Surgeons must ensure that new kidneys function well alongside the existing ones, sometimes requiring advanced surgical techniques to accommodate them.
   • Immune System and Organ Rejection: After each transplant, the body’s immune system must be suppressed to prevent rejection of the new organ. However, this opens up the body to other health risks, including infections. The more transplants a person undergoes, the higher the risk of complications due to the long-term use of immunosuppressive drugs.

   Barlewar's case stands out because he now has five kidneys in total. The fact that only one of them functions shows how complex and unique his medical journey is. Managing this complexity, both for the surgeons and for Barlewar himself, has required careful consideration and expert medical care.

3. Emotional Impact on Transplant Recipients

   Undergoing a transplant is not just a physical challenge but also an emotional one. For individuals like Barlewar, who have received multiple kidney transplants, the emotional journey is deeply layered:

   • Initial Relief and Hope: When a person receives an organ transplant, there’s often a rush of relief. The immediate removal from dialysis and the restoration of kidney function bring hope for a better quality of life. Barlewar, after his third transplant, expressed immense relief at not needing dialysis anymore, which had been a part of his life for many years.
   • Continued Anxiety and Uncertainty: Even after a successful transplant, anxiety remains. Recipients constantly worry about whether the transplanted organ will function for years or if they might face rejection. Barlewar’s experience of receiving his third kidney illustrates this uncertainty. Despite the relief, the fear of the organ failing again is ever-present.
   • Identity and Self-Image: The physical and psychological adjustment to living with multiple organs is not easy. For Barlewar, adapting to life with five kidneys requires him to navigate not only his physical health but also his mental and emotional state. Issues of body image, self-esteem, and identity often come into play, as people undergoing multiple transplants may feel different from others, even though they continue to contribute positively to society.
   • Social and Emotional Strain: Transplant recipients often face emotional and social challenges. The continuous medical procedures, hospital visits, and physical limitations can affect relationships with family, friends, and colleagues. However, Barlewar’s ability to continue contributing to important national defense projects speaks volumes about his resilience. It shows that despite the strain, transplant recipients can find ways to continue living fulfilling lives, contributing to their communities and the country at large.

4. Ethical Considerations in Multiple Organ Transplants

   The ethical questions surrounding repeated organ transplants are significant, especially when one person receives multiple organs over time. These ethical dilemmas touch on issues of fairness, resource allocation, and medical justification:

   • Equity in Organ Distribution: Organ donations are a limited resource. While medical technology and surgical expertise continue to improve, the availability of organs, particularly kidneys, does not meet the demand. Should one person receive multiple organs if others are still waiting for their first? The ethical dilemma here is ensuring that the distribution of organs remains equitable and that people who are in critical need, especially those waiting for their first transplant, are not unfairly overlooked.
   • Medical Justification for Multiple Transplants: With each transplant, doctors and medical teams must ensure that the procedure is medically justified. Repeated surgeries on one individual must be carefully evaluated to assess whether they stand a good chance of living a productive, healthy life. For Barlewar, his successful kidney transplant story is an example of a rare and medically justified procedure, where the benefits outweigh the risks, allowing him to continue his work and life.
   • Resource Allocation: Every kidney transplant uses a valuable resource—an organ that could potentially save another life. Ethical questions arise when one person receives multiple organs while others on the waiting list do not. This concern raises the issue of resource allocation, where policy must ensure that resources are used in ways that maximize life-saving potential and fairness.
   • The Role of Donors: Barlewar's third kidney was donated by the family of a brain-dead farmer. Their decision highlights the importance of organ donation and the emotional weight it carries. However, the growing number of people needing organs has led to concerns about whether the current systems for procuring organs are ethical and efficient enough. In many cases, people do not consent to organ donation, whether due to lack of awareness, misunderstanding, or cultural reasons, which only adds to the complexities of organ allocation.

5. Global Perspectives on Multi-Organ Transplants: The US vs. India

   Multi-organ transplants, including multiple kidney transplants, are becoming more common worldwide, but the approaches and systems vary significantly from country to country.

   • The United States: The U.S. has a well-established system for organ transplants. In 2024 alone, more than 2,100 multi-organ transplants were performed, showcasing the capacity of U.S. healthcare infrastructure to manage complex transplant cases. The U.S. benefits from a centralized organ donation system, ensuring a relatively efficient process for organ matching, retrieval, and allocation. Additionally, the presence of advanced medical technologies, research, and public awareness campaigns has led to higher success rates in multi-organ transplant procedures.
   • India: On the other hand, India faces challenges in its organ transplant system. The demand for kidneys far exceeds the supply, and while there have been significant strides in raising awareness, many hospitals still face infrastructure challenges. According to the Indian Society of Organ Transplantation, India has seen a gradual increase in the number of kidney transplants, but a lack of public awareness about organ donation, along with legal and logistical hurdles, continues to hamper the system. Transplantation of multiple organs in one patient, like Barlewar's case, is still rare and often involves unique medical and ethical considerations. While India's healthcare system is improving, the disparity between supply and demand for organs remains a serious issue.

6. The Role of Organ Donation

   Organ donation plays a pivotal role in cases like Barlewar's. Without the generous donation from the family of the brain-dead farmer, Barlewar’s life may have taken a very different path.

   In India, the gap between the need for organ donations and their availability is widening. The decision to donate organs remains a deeply personal and often culturally influenced choice. The need for better awareness, education, and a clear understanding of brain death is more urgent than ever to bridge this gap. Public awareness campaigns, particularly in schools and communities, can play a crucial role in encouraging organ donation.

7. Conclusion

   Devendra Barlewar’s experience with multiple kidney transplants is a powerful reminder of both the potential and the challenges of organ transplantation. It brings to light the crucial intersection of medical science, ethics, and the human spirit. While his journey is rare and unique, it raises essential questions about fairness, resource allocation, and the emotional and social toll of repeated transplants. As medical technology advances, the ethical frameworks governing organ distribution must continue to evolve to ensure that all patients receive the care and resources they need.

   In comparison to countries like the U.S., India’s transplant system still has a long way to go. Strengthening organ donation systems and promoting public awareness are essential steps toward ensuring that people like Barlewar can continue to contribute to society, not only as individuals overcoming personal medical challenges but also as individuals who inspire others to support life-saving causes such as organ donation.